Paula Hill 4 School Board

January 23, 2011

GENEVA URA, COMMITTEES, AGENDA

Filed under: Uncategorized — paulahill4u @ 5:22 am

GENEVA DEVELOPMENT

    About the Vineyard URA, or tax benefit to develop the old Geneva property, the short answer to your questions is that we got skunked. The Board and the District agreed that the demands were too stiff, and both sides were maneuvering for the best terms. We worked with a committee from Utah County, the town of Geneva, Alpine School District, the Utah State Office of Education, a representative of all other taxing entities such as the water district, and an at-large member. Three votes would stop it, and we felt confident that ASD and the USOE member held a strong hand.

     Oops. They called a vote, the USOE voted in favor, and it was suddenly all over.

     The longer answer, although not very technical, is that the developer needed tax breaks to be able to accomplish the massive clean-up and build the ambitious commercial/residential design sitting on the drawing board. The proposal was exciting and attractive, but the concessions asked were pretty generous. In particular Alpine School District was resisting the unheard of length of time, 40 years, and the residential component, where property taxes from the 2300 housing units projected would be reinvested with the development while the district would still be required to educate the children from those homes.

     The third problem was the roll-back, or using the tax base from 2006, before the power plant was built, when the property was worth considerably less. Representative Curt Bramble, Provo, passed a bill rolling back the tax rate for the property, which had the effect of raising the tax rate on the entire district. Now that the redevelopment is moving forward, watch for your next tax bill to reflect a $15-17 increase for the average household for a private developer to make big money improving the town of Geneva with your tax dollars.

     Anderson Development had scaled back to 35 years (that’s still two generations of school children) and was preparing other mitigations when the bargaining was suddenly all over. While this is certainly political, it seems that each party was doing his job in representing the interests of those they worked with. We will all enjoy driving along I-15 and seeing a charming little development in place of blight. But I do not understand the roll-back, nor the USOE abandoning us.

     I wrote earlier about seeing two columns, one for what we get and one for what we give. The money guys have done this, and the conservative estimate is that this deal will immediately cost ASD $30 million. Boo, hiss.

COMMITTEES

     Here’s my report from the field, so to speak—I have been a Board member for less than three weeks, and I have been to a ton of meetings!

     I have met with several of our legislators with the Legislative Committee, and I plan to be in Salt Lake quite a bit in the next 45 days to represent the educational interests of our children. I am working with the Bond Committee, exploring how to deal with our growth needs, as well as the maintenance of existing facilities district-wide (Eagle Mountain and Saratoga Springs are predicted to double before the next census, and Lehi will go up by 50%).  I’ve had several meetings as a member of the Board of Trustees for the MATC (that’s the one with the great food).

     I met with my two clusters, Lehi High and Westlake, with a total of 22 schools; the two new schools in Saratoga Springs will bring us to 32% of the district (most board members have one cluster of eight or nine schools). And I attended the District Community Council meeting to get to know the representatives.

     No meetings (yet) but I am scheduled for the Building and Grounds Committee, representing the north and west of the district. I am also on the Curriculum Review Committee and I am an alternate on the Public Relations Committee and the North County Medical Coalition.

     And dear Mr. Wonderful drives me everywhere, opens the car door and carries my books, then finds a quiet corner and does his reading while I make sure he gets a taste of whatever refreshments are served. Sometimes he critiques my comments or reminds me to stop talking and go home. Am I blessed? Wow, what a guy!

 AGENDA FOR JANUARY 25 BOARD MEETING

To be held at Oak Canyon Junior High

“The purpose of the study session (4 p.m.) will be to receive a report from the Bond Committee, particularly in regards to a proposed survey to patrons, and to discuss other current issues.”

8 Comments »

  1. I am so disappointed too about the school Board passing that multi-million dollar handout for a special interest group. The people who argued for it made up that Bologna about the “Geneva blight”. It’s not so hideous to overshadow the benefit of being frugal and prudent.

    I’m glad you pointed out that we tax-payers are going to have to foot the bill for all those kids raised there, to basically bail out that developer. Also tough luck for all the owners of empty buildings and stores elsewhere in the county. The Geneva development has been handed a taxpayer bailout with promises of how lucky we’ll be.

    Comment by Joyce Mitchell — January 23, 2011 @ 5:44 am

    • Please be assured that the Board did NOT pass this deal. The two Board members on the committee voted no, but could not stop it. I will email you the more detailed report Rob Smith sent to Joel Wright

      Comment by paulahill4u — January 23, 2011 @ 6:02 am

    • Thanks for clarifying. Do I have it right now?
      The $300 million tax break for the Geneva Developers was approved by
      2 YES votes from Vineyard town
      1 YES from Utah County
      1 YES votes from CUP (representing small taxing entities)
      1 YES votes from Utah State Office of Education
      2 NO votes from ASD

      You said one more NO vote would have killed the thing.
      How could citizens have gotten names of who the voters would be before the vote? I wonder if we could have influenced them.

      Comment by Joyce Mitchell — January 24, 2011 @ 4:55 am

      • The third vote to stop a 2/3 majority was the State Office of Education. You are getting into politics above my experience–I don’t know why they abandoned us. It doesn’t seem very transparent, indeed, but apparently there is no recourse.

        Comment by paulahill4u — January 24, 2011 @ 6:13 am

  2. Glad for your explanation. I still disagree with the vote.

    I’m also happy to see that Lehi High is being reconsidered to relocate. While I know it will be hard to change and will probably meet much resistance, I hope people realize their child can be offered a better facility instead of a money pit that would not do well during an earthquake.

    Tell Mr. Wonderful thank you for his support from all of us. He is a good man.

    Comment by Tiffany — January 23, 2011 @ 3:10 pm

  3. Relocating Lehi High School is long overdue. It is my understanding that city leadership is behind the move and has been since before the last renovation. That is too bad about the Geneva tax mess. Thanks for your explanations.

    Comment by Mary — January 24, 2011 @ 4:38 pm

  4. A line from ASD board member Wendy Hart said:
    “From the legislation, it appears that a resident of Vineyard City can appeal this URA decision. Do you know anyone who lives in Vineyard City? I think this decision should be appealed.”

    What else can we do to reverse this? She also wrote:

    “Also, there is proposed legislation this session rolling back the URA/CDA approval process from 2/3 majority to a simple majority. This bill would result in even more unfair situations similar to the Geneva property. ASD would be forced to participate in more URAs at the additional cost burden to the average resident. I would recommend you contact your legislators to oppose this legislation. They need to understand the current situation in which you can be taxed without your consent and without an appeals process.”

    It seems to me that we are allowing decisions to be made that are not in our best interest. How do we as a community become better informed and not allow such manipulation?
    I know–big question. Thank you for all that you are doing and for being our eyes and ears.

    Comment by Sandy — January 24, 2011 @ 8:35 pm

    • Why did I think the board of education would be about education? Early in my campaign Senator Mark Madsen told me bluntly, “You are a taxing entity; you ARE political.” Sigh.
      I am new to the table, and this project was moving along as I came on. However I will work to keep us all informed, and ahead of the special interests.
      I am not sure this issue is dead. I am getting a lot of calls and emails from indignant citizens who are not inclined to take this lying down. Stay tuned….

      Comment by paulahill4u — January 25, 2011 @ 5:40 am


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.